Your Wednesday Retrospective: Spookypasta Revisited

This is an addendum to yesterday’s post about spookypasta.

A friend asked me last night to clarify what the distinction is between creepypasta and spookypasta. On the surface, both seem quite similar. The critical distinction is that the object of study in spookypasta is the act and cause for the in-universe authoring of the fictional text. In other words, it is the in-universe authorship of the text, along with the attendant circumstances of its creation, which makes a creepypasta a spookypasta. This turned out to be an insufficient litmus test.

Continue reading

Posted in Tuesday Spooky | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Your Tuesday Dose of the Spooky: Spookypasta

Spooky Pasta

(Squint your eyes. Some of those bones look like elbow pasta.)

It’s Tuesday again!  Time for your weekly dose of the Spooky, culled from around the web, the world, and life.  Every week I’ll have something new to send a shiver down your spine.

This week’s theme is spookypasta.  What is spookypasta, you ask?  As you might gather from the name, spookypasta is closely related to creepypasta, but spookypasta is slightly more literary.  Did I make that up?  Yes I did.

Spookypasta is a term I am reserving for literature (IE, content; texts of all sorts) that is itself haunted or creepy by virtue of the circumstances surrounding its creation or purported creation.  For instance, Ted the Caver, The Dionaea House, Candle Cove, and The Noise Coming from Inside Children are all excellent examples.  In each case, you not only have a text that is terribly spooky in and of itself, but the fictional tale of each text’s authorship is spooky as well:

Continue reading

Posted in Tuesday Spooky | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Movie Review: The Gallows (2015)—You Aren’t Giving This Film Enough Credit

[Note: To do the sort of detailed analysis of the film that I like to do requires some spoilers.  I’m not going to tag each one.  If you’d rather see this movie cold, go watch it, then come back.]

Here’s the official marketing blurb:

20 years after a horrific accident during a small town school play, students at the school resurrect the failed show in a misguided attempt to honor the anniversary of the tragedy – but soon discover that some things are better left alone.

After reading a review that literally begged the reader not to go see The Gallows I was a bit disappointed.  I’d seen the original movie trailer and the movie had seemed promising, so I’d been looking forward to it for some months.  The scene in the trailer used my favorite filming technique of allowing something to slowly move out of the background without further comment.  I was hoping that it would be a film that had the confidence to let things be scary without trying to force it to be scary.  Despite the awful reviews I read, it largely succeeds in that regard, and the movie is scary.

The-Gallows-WB-PosterHowever, the movie has some serious problems as well, and the signs of those problems were evident right from the trailer.  While those problems are very real, I don’t think this movie deserves the harsh reviews it’s received.  Hopefully I’ll be able to highlight some of the things that make this film very worth watching (and you should watch it), but I’m not going to go easy on its flaws.

The two biggest complaints I’ve read about The Gallows are bad acting and predictability.   I’ll address these first: I don’t think the acting was bad in this film.  The characters were teenagers, and they acted like teenagers.  They made a lot of stupid decisions, and are generally asshats, but that isn’t out of character.  A specific charge I read said that the actors seemed like they were in fact attempting to method-act being bad at acting—but were themselves bad at it.  I quite simply don’t agree with that charge.  The acting seemed lively to me; their fear was convincing.  I think that the reviewer I read was conflating the fact that he hated all the characters with his perception of their acting skills.  While I partially agree in that I don’t like some of the characters, I thought their characterization was good, and I think the overall writing of the characters themselves was smart—more on that later.

Regarding predictability in the twist, I’m going to have to agree on this one, but I don’t think the twist specifically harms the film.  There are some problems with the specifics of the plot, but overall I think the plot was strengthened by the twist rather than weakened.  Without it, there wouldn’t have been any point to the events that happened, which, while still scary, would have strained credulity as to why such serious incidents had not taken place in the school’s theater before then—and credulity is a thing that this film cannot afford to spend freely.  More on that later as well.

Continue reading

Posted in Movie Review | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Your Tuesday Dose of the Spooky: Sudden Deep Water

It’s Tuesday again!  Time for your weekly dose of the Spooky, culled from around the web, the world, and life.  Every week I’ll have something new to send a shiver down your spine.

This week’s theme is Sudden Deep Water.

Let’s face it, with few exceptions, mankind is a land dwelling species.  Sure many cultures over the centuries have produced amazing seafarers, but deep down we all know that it’s safest on Terra firma.  But what happens if we leave that safety for a quick dip in the lake?  Refreshing, right?

Wrong.  It’s terrifying.

Consider the following aptly-named thread “Where is the scariest place on earth.” According to u/ChuckItRealGood, the answer is Higgins Lake, where there is a sudden drop off and the bottom that was only a few feet down falls away to blackness.  Here is the relevant excerpt from his contribution:

See that dark blue strip out there?  It's blue because the water becomes hundreds of feet deep over the course of a few yards.

See that dark blue strip out there? It’s blue because the water becomes hundreds of feet deep over the course of a few yards.

In Northern Michigan, there is a lake called Higgins Lake. Beautiful, cerulean blue waters and a gorgeous place in general (voted by National Geographic as the 6th most beautiful lake, at one time) … However, the water is strangely shallow for hundreds of feet, around the perimeter of the shore.

But a few hundred feet out – the depth suddenly changes from waist-deep to a sudden drop-off. The tropical-blue water morphs into deep-blue / black … (http://harrysoms.blogspot.com/2007/05/story-of-higgins-lake.html)

As a kid who used to summer here, my friends and I always found interesting ways to “play chicken” with the drop-off … until one year my cousin got hit with a strange updraft from the dark waters that was very cold. She was so caught off guard by the wash of icy water that she almost couldn’t swim back to the ledge.

Never again.

Continue reading

Posted in Tuesday Spooky | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Numbers Stations (June 2015 Cinematic Meeting)

June 2015 Cinematic Meeting: Numbers Stations

The Conet Project

The Conet Project, a compilation of dozens of numbers station recordings.

Aromatic Accompaniment: Midnight Berry by Chesapeake Bay Candle.

The theme this month was numbers stations.  Surprisingly, I was the only member of the Society present for the meeting who knew what number stations were.  To those who don’t know, a numbers station is a radio station that plays only a cryptic stream of numbers and letters (Lost made use of a number station).  In some cases they may also play snippets of tunes, foghorns, or other oddities.  Before you go out in your car looking for one of these, know that these aren’t typically AM/FM broadcasts.  Instead, you would need a shortwave radio to pick them up.

Numbers stations make for good horror inspiration because of their mysterious nature.  Who wouldn’t find this at least a tiny bit unsettling?  Numbers stations are frightening because they are obviously a deliberate product of human action—they have purpose—but they have no context; they just are.  The abruptness of something that is deliberate so unexplained clashes with our expectations of cause and effect.  A numbers station is an effect without a cause, and human beings find that disturbing.

The logical reaction to the sinister appearance of an effect with no apparent cause is to locate (or make up) a cause to go with it.  Radio broadcasts that feature intelligible speech (even if the speech itself is indecipherable) are clearly of human origin, and so the obvious questions to ask are who and why.  Our video shorts for this meeting both seek to answer that question.

Continue reading

Posted in Cinematic Meeting | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment